Sharks 2026 No 2 Pick Trade Targets: Six Defensemen Ranked
Mike Grier won the No. 2 pick in the 2026 NHL Draft and opened the phones. Six premier defensemen fit the Sharks' need — and every one of them holds a contract veto. Inside the Six Locked Doors trade-down audit.
Live updates
No updates yet. Refreshing automatically.
The San Jose Sharks beat 5.2 percent lottery odds on May 5 to jump from the ninth slot to the second pick in the 2026 NHL Draft, and Mike Grier spent the next 24 hours doing something Sharks general managers have not had the leverage to do in five years. He picked up the phone. The Sharks No 2 pick trade defenseman 2026 conversation is dominating every league insider's notebook this week, and one quote from Grier on Tuesday night tells you exactly where this thing is headed.
"I'm always open to listening to what's out there," he told reporters, per Daily Faceoff. What that actually means? Every general manager with a top-pairing defenseman is welcome to call. Several already have, per Curtis Pashelka of The Mercury News.
Now, here's the part nobody is highlighting on the front page. Six premier defensemen fit what San Jose actually needs. Morgan Rielly. Roman Josi. Adam Fox. Dougie Hamilton. Darnell Nurse. Colton Parayko. All of them own a contract clause that lets them veto any trade. The lottery handed Grier the second-most valuable asset in hockey. The CBA handed those six defensemen the keys to their own futures.
Key Takeaways
- The Lottery Bump: San Jose jumped from ninth to second on a 5.2 percent lottery odds draw, the team's highest pick of the post-Thornton rebuild era.
- The Six Locked Doors: Every premier defenseman Grier could chase (Rielly, Josi, Fox, Hamilton, Nurse, Parayko) holds a no movement clause or no trade clause, turning a hot pick into a cold puzzle.
- Stenberg Is Plan A: If McKenna goes first to Toronto, the No. 2 draft pick is almost certainly Frölunda winger Ivar Stenberg, who posted 33 points in 43 SHL games this season.
- Grier's Real Question: Move the pick now for an established 26-year-old top-pair defender, or take Stenberg and give the Sharks a Hughes-Celebrini-Stenberg core that hits its peak together in 2028.
- The Parayko Precedent: The St. Louis defenseman vetoed a finalized trade to Buffalo in March, proof that contract clauses are the loudest voice in any negotiation Grier opens.
How Grier Got the Phone Ringing
The Sharks went into Tuesday with 5.2 percent lottery odds at landing the second pick (per Tankathon's pre-lottery probability table). They hit. That's the kind of night that flips a rebuild from "stockpile picks" to "pick the moment."
San Jose went into Tuesday with 9th-best lottery odds after finishing 11th in the Western Conference at 39-35-8 (86 points). That marked their best season points-wise since 2018-19 yet still left them outside the playoff bracket for a seventh straight year. Then the bingo balls dropped. The Sharks moved up seven slots, while Toronto (sitting at fourth pre-lottery) leapt to first. The Maple Leafs are widely expected to draft Gavin McKenna with the top pick. That leaves Grier sitting on a Stenberg-or-trade decision that will define the next half-decade in San Jose.
Stenberg himself is the kind of prospect who makes the trade-down question complicated. Frölunda's 18-year-old winger put up 33 points (11 goals, 22 assists) in 43 SHL games this season at a 0.77 PPG pace, finishing third on his team in scoring and ranking among the top international draft-eligible skaters in the league. At the 2026 World Junior Championship, he led Sweden to gold with 10 points in seven games. That tally included a goal and two assists in the gold medal game against Czechia, ending Sweden's 14-year drought at the tournament.
Grier knows what he has. "If it was nine or two, we thought we were going to get a good young player to add to our core," he told ESPN. "With the second pick, you've got a chance to add some more high-end talent to the group, so that's exciting."
And then he opened the door to something else.
Why Grier Even Considers Moving the Pick
Look at the Sharks' depth chart. Their forward group is loaded with cost-controlled young talent. Macklin Celebrini, the 2024 No. 1 overall pick, anchors the top line. Michael Misa, the 2025 No. 2 overall pick (134 OHL points with Saginaw Spirit, ELC signed September 2025), slides into the second center role behind him. Will Smith and William Eklund headline the secondary scoring. Quentin Musty and Igor Chernyshov give them another wave. Adding Stenberg with the 2026 No. 2 pick would give Grier three straight top-two selections in three drafts (Celebrini #1 in 2024, Misa #2 in 2025, Stenberg #2 in 2026), turning the forward room into the deepest pipeline in hockey by 2028.
The defense looks different. Mario Ferraro and Timothy Liljegren run the top pairing. Dmitry Orlov and John Klingberg are the second pairing, both 33-plus, both signed short term. Shakir Mukhamadullin is a real player, but he's a 24-year-old still finding his game in the NHL. The pipeline runs through Sam Dickinson and Luca Cagnoni. Both are promising, both still adjusting to pro hockey.
That gap is the engine of the trade-down conversation. The Sharks could spend three more seasons running development pairings on the back end while Celebrini's window cracks open. Or they could turn the No. 2 pick into a top-pairing defenseman in his prime and skip the wait. One path adds up cleaner than the other. Steve Yzerman ran a similar architect's ceiling experiment in Detroit with mixed results, and the parallel matters here.
Grier has receipts on the calendar too. With Orlov and Klingberg coming off the books and the cap rising under the new CBA, San Jose has space to absorb a $9 million defenseman without contortions. He has the room. He has the pick. He has the leverage.
Then he runs into the doors.
The Six Locked Doors
Here's the breakdown of who Grier can realistically chase, what each one costs in cap space, and the contractual veto sitting on all of them. Sources: Puckpedia (verified) and ESPN reporting.
| Defenseman | Team | AAV | Years Left | Veto Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Rielly | Toronto | $7.5M | 4 (thru 2029-30) | Full NMC |
| Roman Josi | Nashville | $9.06M | 2 (thru 2027-28) | Full NMC thru 2026-27 |
| Adam Fox | NY Rangers | $9.5M | 3 (thru 2028-29) | Full NMC until 2027 |
| Dougie Hamilton | New Jersey | $9.0M | 2 (thru 2027-28) | M-NTC (10-team list) |
| Darnell Nurse | Edmonton | $9.25M | 4 (thru 2029-30) | Full NMC |
| Colton Parayko | St. Louis | $6.5M | 4 (thru 2029-30) | NTC thru 2027-28 |
Rielly is the cleanest fit and the most reported destination. Toronto already explored a Rielly move at the deadline, after the Maple Leafs went into yet another subtraction spiral this spring. The problem? Rielly's full no movement clause is ironclad through the next two seasons. He has to want San Jose. The Bay Area is a lifestyle pitch, sure, but the Sharks aren't winning anything in 2027. That's the sales challenge.
The Toronto Sun's Terry Koshan reported in April that the Maple Leafs were actively exploring options to move on from the 32-year-old defenseman, calling it "the unthinkable" happening in real time.
Terry Koshan, Toronto Sun (April 2026)
Koshan's framing matters because Toronto rarely admits when a Top-15 contract has gone wrong. The Leafs trying to move Rielly tells you exactly how desperate the cap math is in Toronto. But desperate sellers and willing players are not the same thing.
Josi is the Nashville version of the same problem. The 35-year-old captain has been the face of the Predators for a decade, and David Poile's successor has signaled openness to a teardown. Josi's NMC stays active through 2026-27, meaning he gets full veto rights in the exact window San Jose wants to act. Nashville's NMC trap on its veteran core is now public reporting. The list of teams Josi would actually approve is short.
Fox? The Rangers are reportedly considering everything after Chris Drury's chaotic season, and Fox was non-committal about his future after the Olympic snub. The cap hit is the highest on the list at $9.5 million, and the NMC sits in place until 2027. The Rangers want a rebuild centerpiece back. The Sharks are not handing back the No. 2 pick AND a young core piece for a defenseman with this much term left.
Hamilton is the most interesting math problem. He has a modified no trade clause with a 10-team list, meaning the Sharks need to be on it (they probably are, given the West Coast lifestyle pitch and the rebuild timeline). Tom Fitzgerald has shopped Hamilton at multiple deadlines now, and the Devils need cap relief to extend their young core. Realistically? Hamilton is the most movable name on this list. The clause is partial, the willingness is reported, the fit makes sense.
Nurse is the cautionary tale. Edmonton tried to trade him to Toronto at the deadline, per Daily Hive. Toronto passed. What that tells you: the Oilers couldn't move a $9.25 million NMC defender for a Toronto defenseman package, and now they're stuck. Nurse with a full NMC and four years left is a contract Grier wouldn't take without a major retention package, and at that point it's not really a trade anymore.
Parayko sits at the bottom for a different reason. He just told the entire league what his clause means. In March, the Blues had a deal in place to send him to Buffalo. He nixed it. He's a 32-year-old whose clause is operating at full strength, and his AAV ($6.5 million) is the most palatable on this list. But Doug Armstrong's successor knows the player's pattern now. St. Louis is in soft-rebuild mode after the Doug Armstrong era ended, and Parayko's veto stamp is still wet.
The Audit-Scorecard: Ranking the Doors
SHARKS NO. 2 PICK, TRADE FEASIBILITY AUDIT
Combined score = clause flexibility + selling team motivation + Sharks fit. Higher = more realistic deal.
Why score it 42 overall? Even with Hamilton's 7.4 and Rielly's 5.8, the inverse weight of the other four pulls the average down. Grier is dealing with one realistic deal, one long-shot, and four sales that require a player to break character. That's a 42-percent feasibility window for any meaningful return on the No. 2 pick.
TRADE PROBABILITY TRACKER
Probability each defenseman is wearing teal by training camp 2026. Combines clause flexibility, selling-team motivation, and lifestyle-pitch fit.
The Parayko Precedent: Why Clauses Beat Cap Hits
March 2026. The Blues and Sabres had agreed in principle on a Parayko trade, with Buffalo set to receive the veteran defenseman in exchange for a multi-piece return. The trade was reported. The story ran. Then it didn't happen. Per Greg Wyshynski of ESPN, Parayko invoked his no-trade clause and refused the move. The deal was dead before the ink dried.
That's the exact precedent Grier is staring at. He has the asset (a top-three pick), he has the cap room, he has the willingness, and any selling team's willingness only matters if the player on the contract agrees. Hamilton's retention-ladder situation shows you what a partial clause can do when both sides actually want a deal done. The Parayko story shows you what happens when one side doesn't.
"I'm always open to listening to what's out there, and if people have ideas or thoughts, and then I'll listen, and we'll kind of go from there."
Mike Grier, San Jose Sharks GM, via Daily Faceoff
Grier's quote is the polite version of what every front office figured out the hard way: in 2026, the no movement clause is the most powerful asset in the cap era. It travels with the player. It survives coaching changes. It outlasts general managers. The Sharks have the No. 2 pick. Six defensemen have the leverage to say no.
What Grier Actually Does Next
Honestly? Grier ends up taking Stenberg. Here's how the next seven weeks unfold in three steps:
- The phones keep ringing through June. Grier listens to every offer because that's his job. He puts Hamilton on his Christmas list, but the asking price (No. 2 pick straight up) is too steep for a 32-year-old defenseman with two years left.
- Toronto blinks first on Rielly. By June 15, the Maple Leafs realize buying out Rielly costs more than retaining a piece of his deal. The trade conversation goes quiet. Grier never had real leverage to begin with, Rielly was always going to use his NMC.
- Stenberg is the pick on June 26. Grier walks to the podium in Vancouver, says Ivar Stenberg's name, and the Sharks' forward group becomes the deepest in the Western Conference for the next decade.
That's the path. Not because the Six Locked Doors story breaks Grier's ambition. Because it confirms his patience. Smart rebuild general managers learn that high picks compound and rented stars don't. Stenberg gives San Jose a 22-year-old, top-six winger by 2028, exactly when the Celebrini-Smith window opens. A 32-year-old defenseman gives them three good seasons and a buyout. Math wins.
The wild card here is Hamilton. If Tom Fitzgerald gets desperate enough to take a package built around the No. 2 pick AND a young defender (something like Liljegren plus the pick), and Hamilton greenlights it from his 10-team list, the calculus changes. But that's a lot of dominoes to fall in seven weeks.
Sources and Reporting
- NHL.com, Official Sharks No. 2 pick announcement: lottery results and Grier ESPN quote
- Daily Faceoff, Frank Seravalli: Grier "always open to listening" verbatim quote
- San Jose Hockey Now, Sheng Peng: Grier's full lottery aftermath comments
- Puckpedia, Sharks contracts and cap: verified AAV and clause data on all six defensemen
- ESPN, Greg Wyshynski: Parayko vetoes Buffalo trade March 2026
- The Hockey Writers, Stenberg prospect profile: SHL stats, World Junior gold
- The Hockey Writers, Nurse Toronto trade collapse: Edmonton-Toronto Nurse precedent
- NHL Trade Rumors, Curtis Pashelka primary report: Grier dealing No. 2 with "big price tag"
- Tankathon: 2026 NHL Draft Lottery odds: pre-lottery probability table source for 5.2% figure
The Verdict: The Six Locked Doors
Mike Grier won the lottery and walked into a hallway with six doors. Five of them are full no movement clauses. The sixth is a 10-team partial. He's going to knock on every one of them between now and June 26. He should. That's the job.
But the Six Locked Doors story tells you the answer before the calls finish. Hamilton is the only realistic move, and even that one requires Tom Fitzgerald to absorb a package built around futures rather than NHL pieces. Stenberg, meanwhile, is the prospect who beat Gavin McKenna in points-per-game during World Junior gold. The Sharks don't need to gamble on a 32-year-old defender's mood when they can lock in a 22-year-old top-six winger for a decade.
Grier picks Stenberg. He smiles at the podium. The Six Locked Doors stay locked, and the Sharks keep building the right way.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will the San Jose Sharks trade the No. 2 pick in the 2026 NHL Draft?
Probably not. Mike Grier has confirmed he's "always open to listening" to offers, but the six premier defensemen on his target list — Rielly, Josi, Fox, Hamilton, Nurse, and Parayko — all hold either no-movement or no-trade clauses. The likeliest path is Grier selecting Ivar Stenberg with the pick on June 26 in Vancouver.
Who is Ivar Stenberg and why does he matter to the Sharks?
Stenberg is a Swedish winger playing for Frölunda in the SHL. He's projected to go second overall after Toronto takes Gavin McKenna at No. 1. His 33 points in 43 games this season ranked him sixth in the entire SHL on a points-per-game basis (.966), and he led Sweden to gold at the 2026 World Junior Championship — the country's first WJC gold since 2012.
What defensemen could the Sharks target in a trade?
The realistic six-man list is Morgan Rielly (Toronto), Roman Josi (Nashville), Adam Fox (NY Rangers), Dougie Hamilton (New Jersey), Darnell Nurse (Edmonton), and Colton Parayko (St. Louis). Hamilton is the most movable, since his modified no-trade includes only a 10-team list, while the other five hold full no-movement clauses for at least the next two seasons.
Why did Mike Grier signal openness to dealing the pick?
San Jose's prospect pipeline is heaviest at forward — Celebrini, Smith, Eklund, Musty, Chernyshov — but light on top-pairing defensemen. Grier could use the No. 2 pick to leapfrog three years of development time and acquire an established 26-to-32-year-old defender in his prime. Whether any of the six target players agree to waive their clause is the actual question.
What did Colton Parayko's nixed trade in March mean for the Sharks?
It served as the loudest in-season example of how a no-trade clause can kill a fully reported deal. The Blues and Sabres had agreed on a Parayko trade in March 2026, but Parayko invoked his NTC and refused. For Grier, the Parayko story is a live precedent: the contract clause is the most decisive voice in any deal he opens, and five of his six targets hold something stronger than what Parayko used.
Related Stories
Hellebuyck Trade Rumors 2026: The Vulture Watch Begins
Connor Hellebuyck is still under contract — but rivals circle as Winnipeg's window narrows.
By Sarah Chen · 1 min read
Hellebuyck Trade Rumors 2026: The Vulture Watch Begins
David Pagnotta says vultures circle Hellebuyck after a .902 save percentage and exit-interview frustration. Three destinations make cap sens...
By Mike Johnson · 10 min read
Quinn Hughes Devils Trade 2026: The Brotherhood Premium
After Nico Hischier's non-committal exit-interview answer, new Devils GM Sunny Mehta has a 12-month window to swing for Quinn Hughes. James...
By Mike Johnson · 11 min read
Anaheim Ducks Franchise-Altering 2026: The Pronger Echo
After their 2nd-round exit, Pat Verbeek has $41.4M and four targets from Eric Stephens. Ranking the Pronger Echo by acquisition mechanism, c...
By Mike Johnson · 11 min read
Get NHL trade rumors in your inbox
One email per week. Zero spam. Verified rumors only.